A shocking experiment: New evidence on probability weighting and common ratio violations

نویسندگان

  • Gregory S. Berns
  • C. Monica Capra
  • Sara Moore
  • Charles Noussair
چکیده

We study whether probability weighting is observed when individuals are presented with a series of choices between lotteries consisting of real non-monetary adverse outcomes, electric shocks. Our estimation of the parameters of the probability weighting function proposed by Tversky and Kahneman (1992) are similar to those obtained in previous studies of lottery choice for negative monetary payoffs and negative hypothetical payoffs. In addition, common ratio violations in choice behavior are widespread. Our results provide evidence that probability weighting is a general phenomenon, independent of the source of disutility.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Volume 71, Issue2

This paper investigates two behavioral properties of choices between gambles: branch independence and distribution independence. Branch independence is the assumption that probability-outcome branches that are identical in two gambles being compared should have no effect on preference order. In the test of distribution independence, two middle outcomes of fixed probability are sandwiched betwee...

متن کامل

Reconsidering the common ratio effect : The roles of compound independence , reduction , and coalescing *

Common ratio effects should be ruled out if subjects' preferences satisfy compound independence, reduction of compound lotteries, and coalescing. In other words, at least one of these axioms should be violated in order to generate a common ratio effect. Relying on a simple experiment, we investigate which failure of these axioms is concomitant with the empirical observation of common ratio effe...

متن کامل

Utility Theory Violations by Multi-Criteria

This paper discusses two violations of utility theory that can arise with some common multi-criteria hierarchical weighting methods when employed for selection of the best of several alternatives considering multiple criteria. First, these hierarchical weighting methods are found to violate utility theory's principle of independence of irrelevant alternatives. Proof of this violation is made by...

متن کامل

A Novel Scheme for Improving Accuracy of KNN Classification Algorithm Based on the New Weighting Technique and Stepwise Feature Selection

K nearest neighbor algorithm is one of the most frequently used techniques in data mining for its integrity and performance. Though the KNN algorithm is highly effective in many cases, it has some essential deficiencies, which affects the classification accuracy of the algorithm. First, the effectiveness of the algorithm is affected by redundant and irrelevant features. Furthermore, this algori...

متن کامل

Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Pharmacoepidemiologic Research

BACKGROUND Targeted maximum likelihood estimation has been proposed for estimating marginal causal effects, and is robust to misspecification of either the treatment or outcome model. However, due perhaps to its novelty, targeted maximum likelihood estimation has not been widely used in pharmacoepidemiology. The objective of this study was to demonstrate targeted maximum likelihood estimation i...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007